With the U.S. nearing election day, the regulatory landscape for digital assets remains uncertain. Regardless of the election outcome, 2025 will bring about regulatory changes that investors need to be prepared for.
The recent report from the World Economic Forum on global crypto regulation highlights the U.S.’s reliance on enforcement rather than clear policy. This lack of clarity hinders growth and innovation, especially when compared to the structured framework of the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA). The regulatory uncertainty is particularly impactful in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector, where the U.S.’s aggressive enforcement approach has stifled innovation. The recent closure of the SEC’s probe into ConsenSys without charges being filed exemplifies this lack of regulatory consistency, creating challenges for Ethereum-based DeFi projects.
You’re reading Crypto Long & Short, our weekly newsletter offering insights and analysis for professional investors. Sign up here to receive it every Wednesday.
This regulatory uncertainty presents both risks and opportunities as traditional financial institutions enter the digital asset space. These established institutions with sophisticated regulatory strategies are better equipped to navigate the complex compliance landscape compared to smaller crypto-native companies. As major players introduce products like Bitcoin ETFs and tokenized funds, innovators without regulatory expertise may struggle to compete unless they adapt to emerging frameworks such as the Stablecoin Standard, which outlines voluntary requirements for transparency and operational resilience.
For institutional investors, a strategic approach is essential. Using a “regulatory ladder” framework, similar to a fixed-income ladder, can help balance risk and opportunity across various asset profiles:
New entrants from traditional finance: Bitcoin ETFs and tokenized funds with proven regulatory compliance.
Payment processing innovations: Consider regulated stablecoins or payment projects with transparent reserves and governance, similar to New York’s regulated stablecoins like Paxos and GMO-Z.com Trust.
Innovators: Allocate funds to promising early-stage blockchain projects that can adapt to changing compliance requirements.
As potential regulatory changes loom, investors should diversify their crypto portfolios to include both traditional finance offerings and agile innovators with solid regulatory strategies. The U.S. must address its enforcement-focused approach to regulation to stay competitive against more progressive regulatory regimes in the EU and Asia, as highlighted by the WEF.
Note: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of CoinDesk, Inc. or its affiliates.